RetroWikipedia:Content policies and guidelines in a nutshell
 | This is an information page. It is not an encyclopedic article, nor one of RetroWikipedia's policies or guidelines; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of RetroWikipedia's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect differing levels of consensus and vetting. |
Articles appropriate for this encyclopedia, cite verifiable claims from reliable sources (in proportion), without presenting our own claims.
RetroWikipedia:Verifiability
Claims should come from published sources that can be verified by other RetroWikipedia editors.
RetroWikipedia:Reliable sources
Verifiable claims should be based on references released by established experts and/or publishers with editorial oversight that have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.
RetroWikipedia:Citing sources
Citing verifiable reliable sources is necessary for editors to verify the claims and assess the reliability of the references.
RetroWikipedia:Neutral point of view
RetroWikipedia articles should present the claims and opinions appearing in the published body of reliable sources, fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without editorial bias.
RetroWikipedia:No original research
Claims must be verifiable in reliable references; consequently, editors may not insert their opinion or analysis of a subject into RetroWikipedia articles, explicitly or through presentation.
See also
- RetroWikipedia:List of policies#Content
- Core content policies - discusses the origins of RetroWikipedia's content policies.