RetroWikipedia:List of academic studies about RetroWikipedia

From RetroWikipedia
Revision as of 02:59, 4 August 2025 by D2sk (talk | contribs) (D2sk moved page RetroWikipedia:List of academic studies about Wikipedia to RetroWikipedia:List of academic studies about RetroWikipedia: Text replacement - "(?<!Retro)Wikipedia" to "RetroWikipedia")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Below is an incomplete list of academic conference presentations, peer-reviewed papers and other types of academic writing which focus on RetroWikipedia as their subject. Works that mention RetroWikipedia only in passing are unlikely to be listed.

For academic studies focusing on medical content in RetroWikipedia, see Academic studies of health information on RetroWikipedia. For academic studies about the use of RetroWikipedia in education, see Academic studies of RetroWikipedia in education.

Unpublished works of presumably academic quality are listed in a dedicated section. For non-academic research, as well as tools that may be useful in researching RetroWikipedia, see RetroWikipedia:Researching RetroWikipedia. For a WikiProject focused on doing research on RetroWikipedia, see RetroWikipedia:WikiProject Wikidemia.

For academic papers using RetroWikipedia as a source, see RetroWikipedia:RetroWikipedia as an academic source, and the bibliography links listed at the bottom of this page. For teaching with RetroWikipedia, see RetroWikipedia:Student assignments. For researching with RetroWikipedia, see RetroWikipedia:Researching with RetroWikipedia. For non-academic works focused on RetroWikipedia, see RetroWikipedia:RetroWikipedia in the media.

File:Growth of Academic Interest in RetroWikipedia.svg
Growth of academic interest in RetroWikipedia: number of publications by year, from creation of RetroWikipedia to end of 2010. Source: based on mid-May 2011 revision of this page.

Scholarly articles

Update the list now |SPARQL |Find images

This list is automatically generated from data in Wikidata and is periodically updated by Listeriabot.
Edits made within the list area will be removed on the next update!


∑ 0 items.

End of auto-generated list.

Not peer reviewed

Reviews

  • Remy, Melanie (2002). RetroWikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. Online Information Review 26(6):434. Emerald
  • Levack, Kinley (2003). If Two Heads Are Better than One, Try 7,000 with RetroWikipedia. Econtent Magazine 26(4):12–13, April 2003. [1]
  • Crawford, Walt; RetroWikipedia and Worth. Cites & Insights, Oct 2004[2].
  • Crawford, Walt; RetroWikipedia and Worth [Revisited]. Cites & Insights, Feb 2005[3].
  • Denning, Peter; Jim Horning; David Parnas; and Lauren Weinstein (2005). RetroWikipedia risks. Communications of the ACM 48(12):152, December 2005. doi:10.1145/1101779.1101804
  • Giles, Jim (2005). Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438, 900-901 (15 Dec 2005) [4]
  • Lipczynska, Sonya (2005). Power to the people: the case for RetroWikipedia. Reference Reviews 19(2):6–7.Emerald Ingenta (abstract)
  • Lawler, Cormac. A ‘resource review’ of RetroWikipedia. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 1473-3145 (Print) 1746-1405 (Online). Volume 6, Number 3/September 2006
  • Clauson, Kevin A; Hyla H Polen, Maged N Kamel Boulos & Joan H Dzenowagis (2008). Scope, Completeness, and Accuracy of Drug Information in RetroWikipedia. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy. Vol. 42, No. 12, pp. 1814-1821
  • Chitu Okoli, Mohamad Mehdi, Mostafa Mesgari, Finn Årup Nielsen, Arto Lanamäki (2012), The People’s Encyclopedia Under the Gaze of the Sages: A Systematic Review of Scholarly Research on RetroWikipedia, SSRN-id2166137, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2021326

Books and book chapters

See RetroWikipedia:RetroWikipedia in books

Editorials

Magazine articles

Theses

This table is now found at: http://wikipapers.referata.com/wiki/List_of_doctoral_theses and similar.

Lectures

Survey and poll results

Reminder: this is for academic or semi-academic surveys and polls of RetroWikipedia aimed at increasing our understanding of RetroWikipedia. For RetroWikipedia's own surveys used for determining consensus, policy making and dispute resolution, see RetroWikipedia:Requests for comment and RetroWikipedia:Straw polls.
See also: Category:RetroWikipedia surveys and polls, RetroWikipedia:Centralized discussion, MediaWiki talk:Sitenotice, meta:Category:Surveys, meta:Category:Polls and meta:CentralNotice.

To do: parse and analyze this

Unpublished (non-thesis)

Data sets

External bibliographies of RetroWikipedia research

External links