View source for RetroWikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Instructions

{{Information page|WP:RSPI}}

This guide describes the structure of the [[WP:RSP|perennial sources list]], and explains how to maintain the list as new discussions appear on the [[WP:RSN|reliable sources noticeboard]]. Any editor is welcome to update the list using this guide.

== <span class="anchor" id="Prerequisites"></span>Basics ==

The list is structured as a [[H:TABLE|table]] with multiple [[H:T|templates]], split into the following editable subpages (as the result of [[Special:GoToComment/c-S_Marshall-20241002154100-Page_size|a 2024 discussion]]):

{{RetroWikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}

Most edits to the list require a basic understanding of how to build tables and [[WP:TRANS|transclude templates]] using [[H:WT|wikitext]]. Since the [[WP:RSP|perennial sources list]] uses table-connected wikitext extensively, it is currently impractical to change a source's status or add a new entry with the [[WP:VE|VisualEditor]]. If you normally use the VisualEditor, please [[Help:VisualEditor/User guide#Opening the visual editor|switch to "Source editing" mode]] before editing the list.

A project-level [[WP:RFC|RfC]] is required for the following:
* Any source that is proposed for '''deprecation''' (see also [[WP:DEPS|the list of deprecated sources]]);

=== Inclusion criteria ===
{{Transcluded section|source=WP:RSPCRITERIA}}
{{RetroWikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources|transcludesection=Inclusion criteria}}

== Templates ==

Several templates are used throughout the list. Some of these templates are located on [[WP:SP|subpages]] of the list, and they should be transcluded into the list in all-caps and prefixed with <code>WP:RSP</code> as a shortcut (which automatically updates when the templates are moved).

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Shortcut
! Template
! Description
|-
| {{temt|WP:RSPLAST}}
| [[RetroWikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Last]]
| "Last" discussion table cell
|-
| {{temt|WP:RSPSHORTCUT}}
| [[RetroWikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Shortcut]]
| [[WP:SC|Shortcut]] box
|-
| {{temt|WP:RSPSTATUS}}
| [[RetroWikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Status]]
| "Status" table cell
|-
| {{{temt|WP:RSPUSES}}
| [[RetroWikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Uses]]
| "Uses" table cell
|-
| {{tlg|rsnl|plaincode=on}}
| [[Template:RSN link]]
| Link to a discussion or [[WP:RFC|request for comment]] at the [[WP:RSN|reliable sources noticeboard]] or its archives.
Substitute if no icon-generation (i.e. not an RfC) or marking as active is needed; this is to prevent the amount of templated wikitext from exceeding [[mw:Manual:Template limits#Post-expand include size|its post-expand limit]].
|-
| {{tlg|efd|plaincode=on}}
| [[Template:EF diff]]
| Link to a diff of the source being added to the deprecated-sources edit filter
|-
| {{tlg|sbll|plaincode=on}}
| [[Template:SBL link]]
| Link to a request at [[MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist]] or its archives
|}

The list uses a CSS [[Style sheet (web development)|style sheet]] located at [[RetroWikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css]].

== Examples ==
<templatestyles src="RetroWikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

=== Simple ===

<syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext">
|- class="s-nc" id="Example_Source"
| [[Example Source]]
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| {{subst:rsnl|100|Reliable sources noticeboard discussion title|1}} {{subst:rsnl|200|Second discussion|2}}
[[WT:WikiProject Video games/Sources#Non-RSN discussion title|A]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2015}}
| Description of source and summary of past discussions.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|example.com|example.net}}
</syntaxhighlight>

{| class="wikitable sortable perennial-sources"
!rowspan="2" | Source
!rowspan="2" | Status<br /><small>([[#Legend|legend]])</small>
!colspan="3" | Discussions
!rowspan="2" class="unsortable center" style="width: 4em;" | Uses
|-
! class="unsortable" style="width: 4.5em;" | List
! Last
! class="unsortable" | Summary
|- class="s-nc" id="Example_Source"
| [[RetroWikipedia:Example|Example Source]]
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 100#Reliable sources noticeboard discussion title|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 200#Second discussion|2]]
[[WT:WikiProject Video games/Sources#Non-RSN discussion title|A]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2015}}
| Description of source and summary of past discussions.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|example.com|example.net}}
|}

=== Advanced ===

<syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext">
<section begin="deprecated"/>
|- class="s-b" id="Blacklisted_Source"
| ''[[WP:Example|Blacklisted Source]]'' {{small|(''Nickname'', [[WP:Example|Also-deprecated BS-run source]])}} {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:BS}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|d|b=y}}
| {{sbll|January 2017|Blacklisted Source|2017}} {{rsnl|100|RfC: Blacklisted Source|2020|rfc=y}} {{efd|869|42|2017}} +8{{efn|See also these discussions of ''Blacklisted Source'':
{{subst:rsnl|1|Discussion 1|1}}
{{subst:rsnl|2|Discussion 2|2}}
{{subst:rsnl|10|Discussion 3|3}}
{{subst:rsnl|11|Discussion 4|4}}
{{subst:rsnl|12|Discussion 5|5}}
{{rsnl|20|Discussion 6|6|active=y}}
[[Talk:Example Source#Discussion A|A]]
''[[RetroWikipedia:Example#Discussion B|B]]''
}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025|inprogress=y}}
| Description of source and summary of past discussions. 
| {{WP:RSPUSES|example.com|example.net|example.org|example.info}}
<section end="deprecated"/>
</syntaxhighlight>

{| class="wikitable sortable perennial-sources"
!rowspan="2" | Source
!rowspan="2" | Status<br /><small>([[#Legend|legend]])</small>
!colspan="3" | Discussions
!rowspan="2" class="unsortable center" style="width: 4em;" | Uses
|-
! class="unsortable" style="width: 4.5em;" | List
! Last
! class="unsortable" | Summary
<section begin="deprecated"/>
|- class="s-b" id="Blacklisted_Source"
| ''[[WP:Example|Blacklisted Source]]'' {{small|(''Nickname'', [[WP:Example|Also-deprecated BS-run source]])}} {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:BS}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|d|b=y}}
| {{sbll|January 2017|Blacklisted Source|2017}} {{rsnl|100|RfC: Blacklisted Source|2020|rfc=y}} {{efd|869|42|2017}} +8{{efn|See also these discussions of ''Blacklisted Source'':
[[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 1#Discussion 1|1]]
[[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 2#Discussion 2|2]]
[[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 10#Discussion 3|3]]
[[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 11#Discussion 4|4]]
[[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 12#Discussion 5|5]]
{{rsnl|20|Discussion 6|6|active=y}}
[[Talk:Example Source#Discussion A|A]]
''[[RetroWikipedia:Example#Discussion B|B]]''
}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025|inprogress=y}}
| Description of source and summary of past discussions. 
| {{WP:RSPUSES|example.com|example.net|example.org|example.info}}
<section end="deprecated"/>
|}

{{tnote}}

== Columns ==
=== Source ===

The "Source" column of the table displays up to four items:

# '''Name:''' The name of the source, linked to the corresponding article. Italicize the name if the article does the same.
#* Sources that do not have a corresponding article or redirect should generally be excluded from the list.
# '''Aspects''': ''(optional)'' When there are multiple entries covering different aspects of the same source, list the aspects inside parentheses after the name. Examples of aspects include:
#* Media on which a source is published (e.g. website, print)
#* Topics covered by the source (e.g. politics, science)
#* Authors published in the source (e.g. staff, contributors)
# '''Aliases''': ''(optional)'' If the source is also referred to by at least one alias, list the prominent aliases within parentheses inside a {{tlx|small}} template. Aliases can include:
#* Commonly used abbreviations
#* Nicknames, former names, and alternative names
#* Names of closely associated publications and companies (including [[parent companies]] and [[subsidiaries]])
# '''[[WP:SC|Shortcut]]''': ''(optional)'' A shortcut to the list entry, displayed with the {{temt|WP:RSPSHORTCUT}} template

=== Status ===

The status of a source is indicated in two ways:

# The table row uses a [[H:CSS|CSS]] class value that displays a background color.
# The {{temt|WP:RSPSTATUS}} template is passed a parameter, which shows an icon in the "Status" column.

If deprecated, a source's listing should additionally be surrounded in the "deprecated" [[Help:Labeled section transclusion#Section marking|labeled section]] for ease of selective transclusion to {{slink|RetroWikipedia:Deprecated sources|Currently deprecated sources}}. See {{slink||Advanced}} for an example.

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;"
|-
! Status
! Row class value
! {{temt|WP:RSPSTATUS}} value
! Background color
! Icon
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[WP:GREL|Generally reliable]]
| {{plaincode|s-gr}}
| {{plaincode|gr}}
| {{legend|#ddffdd}}
| [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]]
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[WP:MREL|No consensus]]
| {{plaincode|s-nc}}
| {{plaincode|nc}}
| | {{legend|#ffffdd}}
| [[File:Achtung-orange.svg|20px]]
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[WP:GUNREL|Generally unreliable]]
| {{plaincode|s-gu}}
| {{plaincode|gu}}
| {{legend|#ffdddd}}
| [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px]]
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[WP:DEPREC|Deprecated]]
| {{plaincode|s-d}}
| {{plaincode|d}}
| {{legend|#ffbbbb}}
| [[File:Stop hand.svg|20px]]
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | [[WP:RSP#Blacklisted|Blacklisted]]
| {{plaincode|s-b}}
| One of the above
| {{legend|#dddddd}}
| [[File:X-circle.svg|20px]]
and one of the above
|}

To represent a blacklisted source in the "Status" column, set the {{temt|WP:RSPSTATUS}} template's '''b''' parameter to {{code|y}}. The '''b''' parameter is independent from the template's value. For example, a blacklisted generally unreliable source is indicated with {{temt|WP:RSPSTATUS|gu|b{{=}}y}}, while a blacklisted deprecated source is indicated with {{temt|WP:RSPSTATUS|d|b{{=}}y|alttext=WP:RSPSTATUS|code=on}}. A blacklisted source has a gray background color, and shows both the "X" icon and the icon corresponding to the source's reliability.

A source's status should be consistent with its {{pslink|summary of discussions}}.

=== List of discussions ===

The discussions in the "List" column determine the contents of the source's [[#Summary of discussions|summary]] and the value of the source's {{pslink|status}}.

==== Ordering discussions ====

Discussions on the source are linked from the "List" column in the following order:

# {{uu|<strong>Major discussions:</strong>}} List major discussions in chronological order.
#* '''Uninterrupted [[WP:RFC|requests for comment]] on the [[WP:RSN|reliable sources noticeboard]] and its archives'''
#** Use {{tlx|rsnl}} to link to these RfCs. Set the '''rfc''' parameter to {{code|y}}, and the link text to the year on which the RfC was closed. Set the '''active''' parameter to {{code|y}} if the RfC is active. For example:
#*** An RfC located in archive 1 of the noticeboard that was titled "Example discussion" and closed in 2007 would be represented with {{tlx|rsnl|1|Example discussion|2007|rfc=y}}.
#*** An active RfC titled "Example discussion" in the year {{CURRENTYEAR}} would be represented with {{tlx|rsnl|<nowiki>|</nowiki>Example discussion|{{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>|rfc=y|active=y</nowiki>}}.
#** Interrupted RfCs (i.e. RfCs that were withdrawn or closed as invalid) are not considered major discussions, but they can still be linked as ordinary noticeboard discussions.
#** RfCs held in other locations are not considered major discussions, but they can still be linked as ordinary non-noticeboard discussions.
#* '''Successful [[WP:SBL|blacklisting]] discussions'''
#** Use {{tlx|sbll}} to link to successful blacklisting discussions held at [[MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist]] or its archives. Set the link text to the year on which the source was blacklisted. For example:
#*** A discussion titled "Example discussion" located in the October 2007 archive of [[MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist]] would be represented with {{tlx|sbll|October 2007|Example discussion|2007}}.
#** Unsuccessful blacklisting discussions are not considered major discussions, but they can still be linked as ordinary discussions.
# {{uu|<strong>Ordinary noticeboard discussions:</strong>}} List discussions located on the reliable sources noticeboard or its archives in chronological order.
#* Use {{tlx|subst=y|rsnl}} to link to these discussions. Number these links by seeing the link text. For example, a discussion located in archive 1 of the noticeboard that was titled "Example discussion" and is the second ordinary noticeboard discussion in the list would be represented with {{tlx|subst=y|rsnl|1|Example discussion|2}}.
#* Discussions outside of the reliable sources noticeboard are not listed here, but they can still be listed as ordinary non-noticeboard discussions.
# {{uu|<strong>Ordinary non-noticeboard discussions</strong>}} List essential discussions located outside of the reliable sources noticeboard and its archives in chronological order.
#* Use a [[WP:ANCHOR|section link]] for these discussions. Set the link text to the letter of the alphabet that corresponds to the discussion's cardinal numeral. Italicize the link if the discussion is active. For example:
#** A discussion titled "Example discussion" located on [[Talk:Example]] that is the first ordinary non-noticeboard discussion in the list would be represented with {{code|<nowiki>[[Talk:Example#Example discussion|A]]</nowiki>}}.
#** An active discussion titled "Example discussion" located on [[Talk:Example]] that is the second ordinary noticeboard discussion in the list would be represented with {{code|<nowiki>''[[Talk:Example#Example discussion|B]]''</nowiki>}}.
#* Keep discussions in this category to a minimum.

Do not link to a discussion more than once in the same source entry. <strong>Active discussions</strong> should be italicized, either through ordinary wikitext (e.g. <syntaxhighlight inline>''[[RetroWikipedia:Example#Discussion B|B]]''</syntaxhighlight>) or by setting {{tlx|rsnl}}'s {{para|active}} parameter (e.g. {{tlx|rsnl||Example discussion|3|active{{=}}y}}).

==== Condensing discussions ====

When there are 4 or more rows of discussions listed in a "Status" table cell, use {{tlx|efn}} to condense the ordinary discussions into an [[WP:EXPLNOTE|explanatory footnote]]. In front of the footnote marker, indicate the total number of discussions linked in the footnote.

* If the entry lists at least one major discussion:
** Condense the ordinary discussions if all of the discussions take up 4 or more rows, and the ordinary discussions take up 2 or more rows.
*** '''1 major discussion:''' Condense the ordinary discussions when there are at least 11 of them.
*** '''2 or more major discussions:''' Condense the ordinary discussions when there are at least 6 of them, or if there are both noticeboard and non-noticeboard discussions.
** Add a plus sign ({{code|+}}) in front of the discussion count.
** The footnote text should begin with {{xt|See also these discussions of ''Example'':}}, with {{xt|''Example''}} being replaced with the source's name.
* If the entry does not list any major discussions:
** Condense the ordinary discussions if there are at least 14 of them.
** The footnote text should begin with {{xt|See these discussions of ''Example'':}}, with {{xt|''Example''}} being replaced with the source's name.

=== Last discussion ===

In the "Last" column, use {{temt|WP:RSPLAST}} to specify the year of the last comment in the most recent discussion listed in the [[#Status|"Status" column]]. If the discussion is currently active, set the '''inprogress''' parameter to {{code|y}}. For example:
* If the most recent discussion of source ended in 2006, use {{temt|WP:RSPLAST|2006}}.
* If the source has an active discussion in year {{CURRENTYEAR}}, use {{temt|WP:RSPLAST|{{CURRENTYEAR}}|inprogress{{=}}y}}.

=== Summary of discussions ===

The "Summary" column describes the [[WP:CON|consensus]] within all non-active discussions indexed in the {{pslink|list of discussions}}. The amount of weight assigned to each discussion depends on the following:

* '''Uninterrupted [[WP:RFC|requests for comment]] on the [[WP:RSN|reliable sources noticeboard]]:''' Uninterrupted RfCs on the noticeboard take precedence over all other discussions.
** If there is a conflict between an uninterrupted noticeboard RfC and an ordinary discussion, use the result of the RfC in the summary for the conflicting matter.
** RfCs held in other locations are not prioritized in this way.
* '''Age:''' Newer discussions are weighted more highly than older discussions.
** If there is a conflict between an older noticeboard RfC and a newer uninterrupted noticeboard RfC, use the result of the newer RfC in the summary for the conflicting matter.
** If there is a conflict between an older ordinary discussion and a newer ordinary discussion, consider both, but weight the newer discussion more highly.
* '''Depth:''' Discussions that examine the reliability of the source in greater detail are weighted more highly than discussions that examine reliability in less detail.
* '''Participation:''' Discussions with more participants are weighted more highly than discussions with fewer participants.

The summary of the source should explain the following:
* '''Reliability:''' State whether there is consensus that the source is [[WP:GREL|generally reliable]], [[WP:GUNREL|generally unreliable]], or [[WP:DEPS|deprecated]].
** If there is no consensus, use neutral wording (e.g. {{xt|"no consensus on the reliability of ''Source''"}} instead of {{!xt|"no consensus that ''Source'' is reliable"}}).
** If the classification only applies to certain topic areas, or if different classifications apply to different topic areas, make this clear in the summary.
* '''Blacklist:''' If the source is on the [[WP:SPB|spam blacklist]] or the [[:m:Spam blacklist|Wikimedia global spam blacklist]], mention this.
* '''Bias:''' If there is consensus that the source is [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]], mention this.
** Recommend [[WP:INTEXT|in-text attribution]] if editors in past discussions do the same.
* '''[[WP:SPS|Self-published sources]] and [[WP:UGC|user-generated content]]:''' If the source is self-published or contains user-generated content, mention this.
** Clarify which sections of the source are affected, if this only applies to part of the source.

The summary may include other guidance on how to appropriately use the source, as long as the information is derived from non-active discussions in the list of discussions.

Qualify the strength of statements in the summary. For example, the phrases "most editors", "some editors", and "a few editors" can be used to communicate a statement's level of support.

=== Uses ===

Apply the {{temt|WP:RSPUSES}} template in the "Uses" column to list the official [[domain name]]s used by the source for publication. If a source does not have a domain name, use an [[em dash]] (—) to indicate this.

== Maintenance ==
As new discussions are started and old discussions are archived, the list should reflect the most current information according to the format described in the [[#Columns|§ Columns]] section above.

When a new source is added or the status of a source is changed, please add an entry for the source under the "[[RetroWikipedia:Deprecated sources]]" bullet-point entry at {{slink|User:JL-Bot/Questionable.cfg/General#WP:RSP}} for CiteWatch.

=== Deprecating a source ===
[[WP:DEPS|Deprecating]] a source involves several steps:
# Close the RfC with a closing statement indicating that there is consensus to deprecate the source. If there is consensus in the discussion to specifically refrain from one of the standard deprecation measures ([[WP:DEPS#Auto-reverted|auto-revert]] or [[WP:DEPS#Edit-filtered|edit filter]]), note this in the closing statement and skip the associated step.
# '''RSP:''' Add or update the source's entry on [[WP:RSPSOURCES|the perennial sources list]].
# '''Revert list:''' Request the addition at {{slink|User talk:XLinkBot/RevertList#Proposed additions}}. Admins may use [[WP:SBH|SBHandler]] to add the domains associated with the source to [[User:XLinkBot/RevertList]] and [[User:XLinkBot/RevertReferencesList]].
# '''Edit filter:''' Add the domain to [[Special:AbuseFilter/869]] in line 3, which starts with {{code|deprecated {{=}}:}}. This requires the [[WP:EFM|edit filter manager]] permission, which administrators can assign to themselves. If without both permissions, request the addition at [[WP:EFN]].
#* After the site has been filtered, link the edit-filter <em>diff</em> with {{temt|efd}}.
# '''CiteWatch''': Add an entry for the source under the "[[RetroWikipedia:Deprecated sources]]" bullet-point entry at {{slink|User:JL-Bot/Questionable.cfg/General#WP:RSP}}.

=== Patrolling RSN ===
{{shortcut|WP:RSNPATROL}}
Patrollers regularly check and maintain the following items from [[WP:RSN|the reliable sources noticeboard]], updates which RSP should also reflect:
* '''Requests for comment'''
** RfCs on sources should be categorized under the "prop" (RetroWikipedia proposals) RfC category.
** Section headings should be prefixed with "RfC:" if and only if the section contains a request for comment that was initiated with the {{tlx|rfc}} tag.
** To track the status of RfCs and prevent automated archiving, RfCs should be tagged with {{tlxs|rsnr}} before the {{tlx|rfc}} tag.
*** If another editor started an RfC without applying the {{tlxs|rsnr}} template, use the timestamp of the [[WP:RFCST|RfC statement]] (from the first signature after the {{tlx|rfc}} tag) as the first parameter, i.e. {{tlc|subst:rsnr|00:00, 1 January 2020 (UTC)}}.
** If an active RfC is prematurely archived, restore the section to its original position on the noticeboard and delete it from the archive. Also restore the {{tlx|rfc}} tag, if it was automatically removed by {{u|Legobot}} while the RfC was archived. Apply the {{tlxs|rsnr}} template before the {{tlx|rfc}} tag to prevent another premature archival.
*** This should never happen unless the {{tlxs|rsnr}} template was omitted in the first place.
** Elapsed RfCs should be listed on the [[WP:RFCL|requests for closure noticeboard]] after they are automatically archived.
** You may [[WP:CLOSE|close RfCs]] if you are an uninvolved experienced editor. Also consider closing other discussions on the requests for closure noticeboard to reduce the backlog.
* '''Discussions'''
** Discussions that primarily focus on the analysis of previous noticeboard discussions should be moved to [[WT:RSP|the talk page of the perennial sources list]] ([[WT:RSP]]). Conversely, discussions on [[WT:RSP]] that primarily focus on new information not found in previous noticeboard discussions should be moved to the noticeboard.
** No heading of any section or subsection of the noticeboard should [[WP:TALKNEW|duplicate an existing heading]]. If there are two  sections with the same heading, disambiguate them. For example, if two different RfCs have "Survey" and "Discussion" sections, use parentheses, i.e. "Survey (''Source Name'')".
* '''Blacklisted links'''
** If a noticeboard discussion contains an external link to a domain that has been added to the [[MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist|spam blacklist]] or [[:m:Spam blacklist|global spam blacklist]], wrap the link in {{code|{{lessthan}}nowiki>}} and {{code|{{lessthan}}/nowiki>}} tags to disable it.
** {{u|Lowercase sigmabot III}} fails to archive discussions when any of them contain a blacklisted link.

===Updating existing entries===
* '''New discussion:''' When an editor creates a new discussion about a source on the noticeboard, record the discussion if there is already an entry for the source.
** Add the new discussion to the entry's {{pslink|list of discussions}} with {{para|active}} set to {{code|y}}.
** In the "Last" column, update the {{pslink|last discussion}} year to the current year, and set {{para|inprogress}} to {{code|y}}.
* '''Archived discussion:''' {{u|Lowercase sigmabot III}} archives noticeboard discussions that receive no replies within five days. Discussions that are tracked in an entry should be updated accordingly.
** If the archived discussion does not have enough participation to meet the [[WP:RSPCRITERIA|inclusion criteria]], remove the discussion from the entry's list of discussions.
** Otherwise, update the RSN link to target the archive page instead of the main noticeboard; when the outcome of the discussion has been determined (e.g. when it is closed), remove the {{para|active}} parameter.
** If there are no remaining active discussions, remove the {{para|inprogress}} parameter from the "Last" column.

== See also ==

* [[RetroWikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources]] ([[WT:RSP]]) – Feel free to ask for help on the talk page if you get stuck.

[[Category:RetroWikipedia perennial sources]]